On sab, mag 17, 2014 at 08:28:13 +0000, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > Reverse dependencies are anything but unrelated. > > Hello julien, from the point of view of the release team. > What should be do now ? > > to my opinion, all we have to do is to upload > zeromq3 with this ugly but necessary +really versionnumber > > 4.0.3+really-3.2.4-1
1:3.2.4 is not as ugly. The 3.x series is unlikely to get any new upstream releases anyway, so the epoch shouldn't be a problem in the future. > then the problem should be fixed once migrated into testing. > > is that all ? Note that e.g. haskell-zeromq4-haskell already requires zeromq 4.x to build, and others (python-zmq, hbro, ...) depend on libzmq3 >= 4.0.1, so zeromq4 should be packaged first, those packages updated to build depend on libzmq4-dev and then zeromq3 re-uploaded with the old version. The other reverse build-deps of zeromq3 should probably be binNMUed as well once that's done to get the proper build-time macros. Cheers
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
