On Wed, May 14 2014, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> I know I can't do that until Jess is released and dpkg 1.17.2 is
>> in stable.
>
> Is it acceptable to put off providing a guile-enabled make.deb until
> jessie+1 ?
Talking to various people I was convinced I was overthinking
this, and as long as there were separate packages for guile, adding
build profiles to the package as needed would not be a blocker.
> If not then perhaps you could make two source packages and a script to
> turn one into the other. You could even leave the guileish version
> for someone else to build.
That would not have been a problem: just adding guile-2.0-dev
to the installed packages list used to build a guile enabled make (and
this was reported as a bug as well :-)
However, the cirrent status is that the make-dfsg source package
builds both make and make-guile; currently without build profiles, and
once jessie is out I shall add build profiles to the control file. In
the meanwhile, of anyone is bootstrapping, and needs help, I would be
happy to be of assistance.
manoj
--
"We're the weirdest monkeys ever." Karl Lehenbauer
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20 05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
