On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:01:10AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 13.05.2014 02:54, schrieb Russ Allbery: > > Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
> >> AFAIK, d-i disabling of s-s-d is a historical workaround for packages > >> not using invoke-rc.d (back in the days before it was a Policy "must"). > >> Maybe it's time to drop this diversion of s-s-d? > > Yeah, that's just what I was thinking. Any software that doesn't honor an > > invoke-rc.d policy is RC-buggy anyway, and it would be good to catch and > > fix that. > Given the responses so far, I might consider doing a MBF based on the > list I posted at [0]. I think this list is pretty complete wrt SysV init > scripts. I could extend that to cronjobs etc if there is interest. > Is there some general agreement that such a MBF would be > worthwile/appreciated? Sounds appropriate to me. > Steve, Bigon, in such a case, would you be willing to help draft the MBF > text? Sure. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
