On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:00:55AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 29/04/14 23:22, Luca Filipozzi wrote: > > It should be mostly corrected now although one name server is still not > > transferring properly. > > > > Technicians have been deployed. > > If there is any more you can tell me about this DNS zone, it would be > nice to document it better at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianGeoMirror > If it is deprecated (as is geomirror.debian.net) that could be mentioned > there. I'm curious how the list of mirrors is maintained, too.
So am I. It used to be a dynamic zone but hasn't seen updates in almost 2 years. It should go away, IMO. > I still find it very useful in combination with a caching web proxy > (better than http.debian.net because that can vary the resultant object > URI, and better than cdn.debian.net because that doesn't consider > mirrors carrying only a subset of architectures). I didn't think anyone used mirror.debian.net, TBH. > Just one other thing - gb.<arch>.mirror.debian.net has two old records > for servers that have been unreachable for many weeks now - I wonder if > they should be updated/removed from the set? > > 163.1.2.224 > 163.1.2.231 Done, FWIW. -- Luca Filipozzi http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140430144812.gb20...@emyr.net