On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:00:55AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 29/04/14 23:22, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> > It should be mostly corrected now although one name server is still not
> > transferring properly.
> > 
> > Technicians have been deployed.
> 
> If there is any more you can tell me about this DNS zone, it would be
> nice to document it better at https://wiki.debian.org/DebianGeoMirror
> If it is deprecated (as is geomirror.debian.net) that could be mentioned
> there.  I'm curious how the list of mirrors is maintained, too.
So am I.  It used to be a dynamic zone but hasn't seen updates in almost 2
years.  It should go away, IMO.

> I still find it very useful in combination with a caching web proxy
> (better than http.debian.net because that can vary the resultant object
> URI, and better than cdn.debian.net because that doesn't consider
> mirrors carrying only a subset of architectures).

I didn't think anyone used mirror.debian.net, TBH.

> Just one other thing - gb.<arch>.mirror.debian.net has two old records
> for servers that have been unreachable for many weeks now - I wonder if
> they should be updated/removed from the set?
> 
> 163.1.2.224
> 163.1.2.231

Done, FWIW.

-- 
Luca Filipozzi
http://www.crowdrise.com/SupportDebian


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140430144812.gb20...@emyr.net

Reply via email to