> Dariusz Dwornikowski <dariusz.dwornikow...@cs.put.poznan.pl> writes: > > >> PKG_CHECK_MODULES([openssl], [openssl], [], > >> [AC_MSG_ERROR([openssl is required for profanity])]) > >> > >> The resulting binary cannot be distributed. > > > Could You elaborate on that ? Why would openssl ban the binary to be > > distributable ? > > The GPL and the OpenSSL license are incompatible. >
Thank You Russ, Would it be ok if upstream adds the clause as explained in [1] ? The upstream is very responsive and open to all suggestions, so it should not be a problem. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00595.html -- Dariusz Dwornikowski, Institute of Computing Science, Poznań University of Technology www.cs.put.poznan.pl/ddwornikowski/ room 2.7.2 BTiCW | tel. +48 61 665 29 41 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140427062258.ga1...@blackstar.cs.put.poznan.pl
