> Il Mercoledì 23 Aprile 2014 10:29, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> ha > scritto:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:10:26 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >> Another package (just an example) is this one, gambas3 [2] that uses sdlgfx > as B-D >> that has been uploaded on unstable on >> [2014-04-11] Accepted 3.5.2-2 in unstable (low) >> > gambas3 has no runtime dependency on sdlgfx. Do you have a better example? ok fair enough, so why is it listed here? [1] [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libsdl-gfx1.2-5.html So for gambas building against both old and new libsdl-gfx1.2-dev is considered harmless? I though it would be cause of troubles or at least bugs, but I think I understand that a segfault is not possible in this case, thanks > Cheers, Have a nice day, Gianfranco > Julien > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1398242915.14588.yahoomail...@web171805.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
