Le Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 05:36:40AM +0200, Matthias Klose a écrit : > > I have not so mixed feelings, but instead very clear feelings now about your > behaviour. You requested explicit information on the mass bug filing request > without reading the obvious channels yourself. Now *you* are requesting that > everybody should be aware of an upload stuck in NEW which isn't yet mentioned > on > packages.qa.debian.org at the time of this writing. What do you want? I feel > this doesn't have to do anything about Debian anymore. Again, please spend > your > time on your packages in Debian which don't migrate from unstable to testing.
Could you please stop spreading false information ? How do you know what I read and what I did not ? I read your announce in January and did not make the connection in April. Now, you can feel free to think that I should have remembered, and I can feel free to think that next time, it would be good if you put a link in your template. And we can agree to disagree. But do not jump on conclusions on what I read or not. Likewise, please stop to make some insinuations about my work on packages that do not migrate to testing. In the case of staden-io-lib, I took action to make it migrate, and it was cancelled by porters who wanted to fix a bug affecting their architecture instead of having the package removed on that architecture. Thus, I do spend time on my packages which do not migrate from unstable to testing. -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140416052207.gi21...@falafel.plessy.net
