brian m. carlson <sand...@crustytoothpaste.net> (2014-04-05): > I just realized my statement was unclear. I believe some people had > stated that GNOME had regressed in accessibility support at the time, > and XFCE was a better choice in this regard. I can't say more because I > don't have enough knowledge on the subject. Maybe someone else can.
Until a few weeks before the wheezy release, we had troubles with gdm3. Most of that was fixed by Emilio, mainly in that upload AFAICT from a (very) quick look: http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdm3/news/20130410T130254Z.html I don't think Xfce has better a11y support than Gnome. It actually lacks some integration (see errata for D-I Jessie Alpha 1); I haven't been able to work on/check approaches suggested on -a11y@ yet. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
