Quoting Ian Jackson (2014-03-12 13:58:51) > If an interpretation of the DFSG suggests that we should be doing work > which does not further those objectives, then I think that > interpretation is a misreading. Conversely, if an interpretation of > the DFSG suggests that we should tolerate a situation which undermines > the freedom of our users, then that would be a subversion of our > values. > > No-one has come up with any practical benefit from the repacking of > source tarballs to remove nonfree files.
I fail to follow your logic. It does not hurt our users' freedoms that we ship minified Javascript code (i.e. functionally identical code but non-reversable to its preferred editable form) - as long as our users ignore the same files as we do in our build routines. Similarly it does not hurt our users' freedoms if we shipped RFC GFDL-licensed documents, as long as they didn't edit those doxuments. I don't understandf how one breed should be treated differently from the other. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
