Jonathan McDowell dijo [Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:38:11AM +0000]: > > Surely this is well within keyring-maint purview and a GR is thus > > unnessecary? Running the plan by debian-project seems a reasonable > > level of consultation. > > We didn't need one for removing PGPv3 keys so I don't see why we'd need > one for 1024D v4 keys.
I was thinking that we might need it just because of the amount of keys. We will end up locking out *many* DDs. > I have already suggested a timescale to -project but haven't seen any > comments on it other than "you should script this" and "should we relax > the requirement for 2 signatures". Right. And that basically gives us green light - But, yes, some will argue it's only involving people actively following said list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140304171151.gh73...@gwolf.org
