-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am 2014-02-23 09:01, schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi Simon, > > I have no idea whether you did follow the discussion but it would > be great if you could submit a patch to the lintian check you > recently wrote. The upstream files will be moved from > debian/upstream (the file) to debian/upstream/metadata. > Hello,
i didn't follow _this_ discussion but still got aware of this issue. I'll come up with a patch soon. Thank you for pointing me to this. Bye, > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 08:34:31AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >> Le 12 févr. 2014 15:41, "Andreas Tille" <andr...@an3as.eu> a >> écrit : >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 04:11:41PM +0900, Charles Plessy >>> wrote: >>>> Le Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:06:42AM -0500, James McCoy a écrit >>>> : >>>>> >>>>> That being said, I don't have access to most of the >>>>> packages. Even >> if I >>>>> did, it feels "dirty" to go and commit to a couple hundred >>>>> packages I have no involvement with instead of adapting two >>>>> pieces of software to deal with both path names. >>>> >>>> Hi James, >>>> >>>> you already have commit access to the Debian Med packages, >>>> like all >> other >>>> Debian developers. Please go ahead ! >>> >>> I take this "go ahead" for "yes, I accept the move". While I >>> would have no problems with this I wonder if it is appropriate >>> to simply go on here without at least informing Debian Science >>> and DebiChem who also maintain some d/upstream files. If I >>> might have sounded against the move in the past my main problem >>> was that the affected parties were not included into the >>> decision making process. >> >> Lintian vive pièce of advice for using debian/upstream file.... >> >> I think the problem will more important than you think >> >> Bastien >>> So I have put the relevant mailing lists in CC to at least give >>> people lurking there some heads up and a slight chance to >>> insist. >>> >>> I would say: If nobody will insist until after the weekend we >>> might go ahead. And for the actual action I agree with Charles >>> that I see no problem if James would simply commit a change to >>> Debian Med repositories (SVN and Git). That's fine and would >>> save us (me or Charles) some work and is perfectly possible >>> permission-wise. >>> >>> Kind regards >>> >>> Andreas. >>> >>> PS: I think I did not got any answer to my question about >>> further plans for the debian/upstream/ dir. I would be really >>> happy to understand the big picture to make sure we will not >>> again invent something which needs to be changed later on. >>> >>> -- http://fam-tille.de >>> >>> >>> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to >>> debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of >>> "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> listmas...@lists.debian.org >>> Archive: >>> http://lists.debian.org/20140212143924.ga21...@an3as.eu >>> > - -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJTDGKKAAoJEBy08PeN7K/pUcUQAKcR3fFPosOIe30bOEbs94nt 0S/mQpNt0rg1vdmKngaE2LASGr1YP1DBnicaS2TgHEllH7M15hVBSX4jgGtz4UtV HtV0VEwdaBO9xCwpDlnWxNJUOtGidp9zoBbFIIE2YRaGJgR6QZq0d30v67M2m8/X I5l4V4dkla/cTW8+QS94mMJ2KWyP20f+GC99J2ht8JEw/IkDkNi3CObX9Yl0bifv ucwcUiQTtn9TAspdlpllFvrhjTpxkUfc4UtazHcgbtaFFoaDsfMd/ScTegoplwpc 9T4WxNYijDxvjPpUR2pnJ2WK08asAgBw9bko/Fkp1xsYFfwktwuzE0mzxkUFEvXY W2Zs+6kDat8mqkl22N2749Hw0HECcbByvmjmSbBgOoy5cjNWKxWvnWwjmsmNuYLR BXznxu7GWVSQguSTA+ug0h52wChmVKNGhb7VESwtWQfN/6vxXtWZiZQ8CQpShYWe 6bFlIIeKf63ILl6trxjpsUyKZF8SRx2q+83RMkw3khsHW8D6g+dVXxJ8+LXdsEOx 11fmpM5N+SpMof88TseCubVrZAwbO0zhunMtOv5ulOpSA3mkij3no32KfaMxLEa7 PpZiU2D4wuOQRqY02cg5BKjTeRw7hV4372tRjIrt2i4E0i4m6ErttqKWfsywmus3 SvfobREfHz97cYzFRoCz =bRJI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/530c628a.8050...@familiekainz.at
