Hi Alexander, hi Adrian, On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:31:27AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 02/24/2014 09:59 AM, Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote: > > I think you did not get clean with this or that's Uwe who mislead you. > > Yep. I misunderstood Uwe. From his first comments it appeared to me > that exactly that had happened. So, I apologize to you Alexander > and take my statements back. I also apologize to both of you, Alexander and Adrian. I wailed to Adrian on irc that I'm unhappy with the package as is and bounced some mails to him. I think I'm the major reason that Adrian got the details wrong. Sorry. It's not always easy to communicate things properly on irc, still more when you're peeved.
> > Those commented out overrides were left in rules file from my previous > > experiments, and not needed anymore. And they have nothing with Uwe's > > package, I believe. > > Alright, thanks for the explanation. > > > I can count all changes I took from his work: > > Arch: linux-any (totally forget that SocketCAN is Linux specific) > > Several strings in description field. > > > > And that's all. =\ > > Ok, it appeared to me that the situation was the complete opposite of > that, i.e. you took Uwe's work and put your name onto it. That's how it felt to me, but technically that's wrong and most parts were done by Alexander. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140224100420.ge27...@pengutronix.de
