On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:58:48PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Thanks for doing the rebuilds!
> * Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net>, 2014-02-18, 22:58: > >┌────────────┬────────────┬───────┐ > >│ current │ buildarch │ count │ > >├────────────┼────────────┼───────┤ > >│ attempted │ attempted │ 317 │ > >│ attempted │ successful │ 26 │ > >│ failed │ failed │ 35 │ > >│ failed │ successful │ 3 │ > >│ successful │ attempted │ 1483 │ > >│ successful │ failed │ 3 │ > >│ successful │ successful │ 8650 │ > >└────────────┴────────────┴───────┘ > >Raw data: > >http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/rebuild-buildarch-20140218.sql.xz > Do I understand correctly that your rebuilds were with -B, and > therefore packages that build only arch:all package were not tested > at all? > It would be interesting to see how packages that builds arch:all > packages behave when rebuilt with -A. > >I hope the above is useful for measuring progress on this front. > >Do we have any plans for enforcing build-arch for jessie at this > >point? If we haven't already, stronger warnings when running > >dpkg-buildpackage and stronger lintian warnings (errors?) would be > >useful to add. > > If build-{arch,indep} is missing, Lintian currently emits > debian-rules-missing-recommended-target[0]. I think we should go > ahead and make it emit debian-rules-missing-required-target[1], > which is on ftp-masters' auto-reject list. > I attached dd-list of packages that were is non-successful state in > the "buildarch" rebuild. Packages marked with "*" were also in > non-successful state in the "current" build. > [0] > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-rules-missing-recommended-target.html > [1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/debian-rules-missing-required-target.html > Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> > * openldap (U) > samba (U) This is not useful without build logs. Both of these packages use dh(1), which is perfectly build-arch-compatible; there's bug #738641 reported on openldap about the libdb5.1 transition, but that doesn't actually cause a build failure yet. So I think this build environment is suspect, and such a summary report is not useful without substantial details. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
