On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:37:59 +0100 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Arch, openSUSE and Fedora are among the most popular and widely > used Linux distributions where most of the upstream development > happens. >
Show me the numbers, I completely disagree and developers from those ditributions such as RedHat have been equally vocal against systemd. > > and two companies shipping products that actually are embedded in a dash > > Those two are multi-billion dollar companies. > With many projects where systemd couldn't even hope to be used. The point is you are trying to make a point out of nothing. > On the other hand, what companies and distributions and companies > actively support Upstart and OpenRC. > Meaningless. How many companies support development of /sbin/init? > Don't diminish the achievements by the systemd developers when > the competition isn't even remotely on par when it comes to > momentum and community and company support. I don't wish to get dragged into what has been discussed far better many times before yet again. I have faith that those that have spoken against systemd have shown good reasoning and understanding and the opposite camp largely misunderstands what already exists and the depth of usage with a few minor plus points. I also realise security benefits are often muted and risks misunderstood. Init scripts are here to stay no matter what happens for many reasons, the only question is what is the best default or init just for Debian. Which is easiest to switch to. Which default may cause bugs and/or lend itself to upstreams making worse and less pliable software. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/374770.71754...@smtp103.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
