On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:49:56AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > Additionally a very good proposal for a PID 1 program was in > http://ewontfix.com/14/ "Broken by design: systemd", copied here for > convenience:
I like how people copy/paste blog articles. Did you read this article? It completely lacks detail and where it does, it is conflicting with itself. E.g. "Reboot to Upgrade", while a bit later: "systemd's systemctl has a daemon-reexec command to make systemd serialize its state, re-exec itself". Meaning: reboot to upgrade is not needed, answer is given in the same text. The objections to daemon-reexec are vague. It's nice to copy/paste this blog, but moving all functionality from pid1 and putting them in pid2 is cool. But you're still totally relying on everything in pid2, so same difference. It pretends to be technical, but the technical bits it does discuss are conflicting. -- Regards, Olav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140211090835.ga24...@bkor.dhs.org
