Even when I dislike systemd approach, you act as a spammer and you annoy
people.
This is the reason you are banned, not the paranoidal crap with "systemd
fanboys blah blah blah".



On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:44 PM, <crgi...@hushmail.com> wrote:

> That was a great article against systemd (note: you'll be banned if you
> respond to this mail, like my other acct was):
> (ewontfix.com/14/). Thanks for posting it.
>
> Note: do not respond to this email, you'll probably be banned. SystemD
> fanbois are rooted deep in every linux distro.
> They get their enemies banned. My other acct was banned for opposing their
> bullsht. For 4 weeks (who cares).
>
>
>
> "The crowd pushing systemd, possibly including its author, is notcontent
> to have systemd be one choice among many. By providing publicAPIs intended
> to be used by other applications, systemd has set itselfup to be difficult
> not to use once it achieves a certain adoptionthreshold."
>
> "None of the things systemd "does right" are at all revolutionary.They've
> been done many times before. DJB'sdaemontools,runit, andSupervisor, among
> others, have solved the"legacy init is broken" problem over and over again
> (though each withsome of their own flaws). Their failure to displace legacy
> sysvinit inmajor distributions had nothing to do with whether they solved
> theproblem, and everything to do with marketing. Said differently,there's
> nothing great and revolutionary about systemd. Its popularityis purely the
> result of an aggressive, dictatorial marketing strategyincluding elements
> such as:Engulfing other "essential" system components like udev and
> makingthem difficult or impossible to use without systemd (but
> seeeudev).Setting up for API lock-in (having the DBus interfaces provided
> bysystemd become a necessary API that user-level programs depend
> on).Dictating policy rather than being scoped such that the
> user,administrator, or systems integrator (distribution) has to
>  provideglue. This eliminates bikesheds and therebyfast-tracks adoption at
> the expense of flexibility and diversity."
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to 727708-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org.
>

Reply via email to