Le 6 févr. 2014 14:37, "Thomas Goirand" <z...@debian.org> a écrit : > > On 02/06/2014 07:06 PM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > >> Since last summer, OpenRC has full support for LSB headers. Also, I > >> believe that OpenRC is the only init system replacement which allows > >> to mix dependencies with LSB or it's own implementation. > > > > That is not the case. Both systemd and upstart allow this as well. > > I knew that both systemd and upstart can use LSB header scripts. But I > read that upstart (at least) would launch these only at the end of the > boot process, not mixing them in the boot order with upstart jobs. Can > any Upstart specialist (Steve maybe?) can tell if this is right or > wrong? What is systemd doing exactly with the LSB dependencies? > > With OpenRC, what happens is that the LSB headers are transformed into > the internal syntax of OpenRC (eg: use, need, after, provide, etc.), > which makes it possible to have LSB header scripts be integrated within > the ordering calculation, just as if they were native OpenRC runscripts. > They are also involved in the dependency loop breaking system that has > recently been added to OpenRC. > > BTW, Debian has a way too many LSB header scripts with Required-Start: > $all, which is very bad. A decent init system has to deal with this, and > there's no sane way to do so but arbitrarily breaking what the author of > the script wrote. A lintian warning telling that $all is just bad would > be a very nice thing. Please report it against Lintian. I will fix it.
Bastien >>How does systemd & upstart deal with this pile of > garbage that Required-Start: $all is? > > Cheers, > > Thomas > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52f38ff3.7010...@debian.org >
