Holger Levsen <hol...@layer-acht.org> wrote: > On Montag, 20. Januar 2014, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> As long as it is a modern SSD (years) or one of the old ones one with >> a sandforce controller (OpenBSD dev let me know about that) then it >> has a good 20% extra space above it's listed gigabytes reserved >> unusable for wear levelling meaning this is a non issue even when >> full? > wait, what? Do you have any vendor statements to support this 20% > extra space? Have a look at this article from Anandtech.com: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6489/playing-with-op ,---- | The [Intel SSD DC] S3700 has 264GiB of NAND on-board but only exposes 186GiB | of it (200GB advertised capacity) as user accessible storage, the rest is | used as spare area to improve performance, consistency and endurance. `---- There are numbers for other SSDs in that article. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core dumped. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hacmbhgmm...@mids.svenhartge.de
