On 23 December 2013 16:54, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: > On 2013-12-23 00:54, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> On 22 December 2013 16:56, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> wrote: >>> Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org> (2013-12-22): >>>> On 28 November 2013 20:04, Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> wrote: >>>>> * Architecture Status >>>>> * ia64 in danger >>>>> * sparc/ppc/mips/kfreebsd at risk >>>>> * s390 dropped from testing >>>> >>>> Is "ppc" - powerpc or ppc64? >>> >>> powerpc. (For ppc64, same answer as below.) >>> >>>> Is ppc64 looking healthy enought to become a release architecture for >>>> jessie? >>> >>> Not in the archive, therefore not something we can release. >>> >>>> What about x32? Is it going to become a release architecture for >>>> jessie? >>> >>> Same answer as above. >> >> Pardon my ignorance but: >> >> * how do architectures move from ports to the archive? > > They are accepted into the archive by the FTP masters. This step is (as > I understand it) largely between the FTP masters and the > porters/advocates of that architecture (see [1]). > > [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/archive-criteria.html > >> * And does such a move require them to become "official" architectures? > > Not sure what "official" is defined as (in this context). But I suppose
Well, I was going by the "official" term from http://www.debian.org/ports/ which also doesn't seem to define what it means. E.g. stable, stable+testing, stable+testing+sid, or testing+sid, sid-only. Any combo, as long as it's in the archive? -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canbhluivrfmyjp-rjj6fvffjjxwvxdertm_bwc74sfgyd0+...@mail.gmail.com