Le 28/11/2013 21:52, Niels Thykier a écrit : >> I've found the builds on the less used architectures have been useful >> for flushing out unusual bugs, particularly when the code ships with >> many test cases and it exposes problems for big endian machines, etc. >> >> Also, kFreeBSD and HURD are both kind of special in that they are not >> Linux, it would be good to keep one or the other around even if other >> architectures are culled more aggressively. >> > > Keeping them around is different from them being considered as release > architectures (or even just keeping them in testing). Keeping these > architectures in testing do involve a burden, like blocking testing > migration when they FTBFS[1].
And what about (somehow automatically, like RC-buggy packages) removing packages from testing only on these architectures? Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52985e1f.2080...@debian.org
