On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> wrote: > Le Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 10:39:46AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit : >> >> I'd have to look at the RC bugs. >> >> I'm looking for a hard commitment here > > Hi Paul, > > I think that if you focused on the compliance with the DFSG, then the NEW > queue > could empty quicker. > > It is a big problem, and it is also a problem of commitment, of doing one task > well instead of accepting too many responsibilities at the same time. The FTP > team is not able to review packages as efficiently as it did in 2011-2012, > please take action by searching for more volunteers or reforming the system, > instead of loading yourself with extra work. > > I know that other developers support the idea of having the FTP team doing > more > checks, but looking at the backlog, this in practice is only wishful thinking, > that boils down to "I am happy that somebody else does the work". This at the > moment does not work, therefore a different strategy is needed.
Please ask for lintian autotest like the gfdl one. I will implement gladly. Bastien > > Have a nice week-end, > > -- > Charles Plessy > Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131116004451.ga11...@falafel.plessy.net > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAbyeXDRgX8cXfyyLgm1j+EaqsUni5m�nP8advqi=k...@mail.gmail.com
