On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:24:02PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > Urgh. How about installing the .py to a private directory (under > > /usr/share say?) and creating non-suffixed symlinks in /usr/bin. > > how that would help in case of a conflict with original MNE's binaries > becoming available/conflicting?
Unless the original puts the .py files in the same /usr/share directory, or starts shipping suffix-less binaries, it won't conflict. > yeap -- I would need to patch their scripts since internally they use > each other... imho could introduce more pain than gain Ouch indeed. Can you convince upstream to strip the .py suffix for a later version? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131031202345.gb...@bryant.redmars.org
