On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Aron Xu <a...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES > <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Aron Xu <a...@debian.org> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES >>> <roucaries.bast...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Aron Xu <a...@debian.org> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> wrote: >>>>>> ]] Aron Xu >>>>>> >>>>>>> > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can locate a board right >>>>>>> > now with >>>>>>> > that - so, we may have to fix remote management with a remotely >>>>>>> > controlled >>>>>>> > power/reset box - I believe they exist (something else I've been >>>>>>> > looking >>>>>>> > into). If the DSA already use some then I'd be interested to hear >>>>>>> > which :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't know if IPMI is available, but there is certain kind of PCI >>>>>>> device that can help with remotely power on/off the machine controlled >>>>>>> by SMS. I'm curious if DSA think IPMI is mandatory for buildd and >>>>>>> porterbox. >>>>>> >>>>>> We would very much like «reasonable remote access». Whether that's IPMI >>>>>> onto a BMC or serial console which can interact with the boot loader and >>>>>> a network-enabled power strip is less important. Of course, having nice >>>>>> features like mounting of ISOs over HTTP and such is a nice bonus, but >>>>>> not a requirement. >>>>>> >>>>>> We haven't really talked about how and when it should be enforced, but >>>>>> I'm reluctant to take on more porter hardware that lacks reasonable >>>>>> remote management. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If we can find a way of letting Loongson 3A board supports remote >>>>> console then you are able to re-install the system because PMON have >>>>> networking support and can boot the system from tftp. Power control >>>>> can be done by hacking the on-board power button pins. >>>> >>>> It could be done trivally from a chip arm card. Using socat from a tty >>>> to a ssh tunnel >>>> see http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/doc/socat-ttyovertcp.txt >>> >>> Looks really cool, and I think it's doable to support power control >>> like what you've suggested already. >> >> What are the safety specification appliable by DSA ? Main tension ? >> Does the board have a power brick ? >> > > I'm not sure about DSA's opinion, and here is the information about > the board. It is an almost standard ITX one, and we've put it in an > ITX chassis retired from a ~2006 Lenovo PC, using its power supply. > The board has some pins for connecting power bottons (Power and > Reset), though we are not using it because it looks not fit to the > connector of the chassis. There is a dedicate button on the board to > power on/off the machine as well. We used the on board button and no > hard reset needed/conducted since successful installation of hardware. > The mentioned ITX machine (6100 model) available for purchase is just > a complete PC box.
The mini itx does not specify a power connector.... So if you use an atx power control do something like this http://www.mupuf.org/blog/2013/05/11/wtrpm-a-web-based-wt-suite-to-power-up-slash-down-your-computers/ > > Thanks, > Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAZ�ek9ml4ygcsxlxzhfu_qq98y9o5gkeftwnpjne...@mail.gmail.com
