Charles Plessy writes ("Re: Proposal: s have a GR about the init system"): > For the choice of an init system, the technical comittee is a typical example > where conflict of interest disqualifies a large number of its members (3 > current or former employees of Canonical). This has been also observed in > comittees making decisions on the approval of pharmaceutical drugs on the > market, for instance, and it is a hard problem to solve.
If you're counting me in those 3, I would like to clarify something. As everyone knows, I left Canonical a number of years ago. I quit, after a number of disagreements (some public, but many more private) with some of the senior staff, because of some very unfortunate behaviour by my management at Canonical. Obviously this is not the kind of thing one makes a lot of noise about, but much of what happened was no fun for me at all and I'm certainly no Canonical shill. For what it's worth, I have complete confidence in Steve and Colin. (I have known Colin for a very long time as a friend, from well before either of us got involved with Canonical.) Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21102.40024.358404.844...@chiark.greenend.org.uk