> Steve Langasek has been consistently posting dishonest FUD against > systemd. Maybe you could explain that as excessive zeal following from > valid technical considerations, but I'd consider that an excessively > charitable interpretation for a member of a body that is supposed to > have public trust.
Please be specific if you ever use the word FUD again as I have it used against myself when the details of what I have stated have simply not been understood or omitted through weariness and it is perfectly possible that varying user requirements simply lead to opposing positions, which is normally a huge and unparalleled strength of UNIX in catering to both when it's tried and tested principles are adhered to. For the record when reading this it occured to me that Steve was being far more reasonable and meritable than you. perhaps the words 'FUD' and 'modern' should be banned as non technical arguments on this list. -- _______________________________________________________________________ 'Write programs that do one thing and do it well. Write programs to work together. Write programs to handle text streams, because that is a universal interface' (Doug McIlroy) In Other Words - Don't design like polkit or systemd _______________________________________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/823544.95358...@smtp135.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
