Thorsten Glaser <tg <at> mirbsd.de> writes: > • Your primary use case appears to be “the desktop”, whereas Debian, as > opposed to some of its downstreams and Pure Blends, is a Universal OS, > which means it’s got much more servers in use, which don’t benefit from > systemd either at all or at least not that much.
I humbly disagree. I'm mainly interested in the perspectives of systemd on servers. For instance: I have in the past had downtime on servers I maintain because Debian out of the box doesn't babysit processes. Apache or MySQL hit by a random once-in-a-year irreproducible crash? Boom. The day of better systemd integration in Debian, where I can uninstall monit, or at least relegate it to application level testing (does this page return 200 OK), I'm a happy camper. If you take a look at the systemd feature set, much of it is aimed towards servers, not desktops. Ole -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/loom.20131025t140418-...@post.gmane.org
