Hi, On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 03:53:35PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> gwyddion: bugs 713565, flagged for removal in 8.3 days > > > > Hmmm, that's really strange. The bug report was closed > > > > Sat, 29 Jun 2013 13:07:42 +0200 > > > > Seems something is wrong with the script. > > > > I am more inclined to believe that you experienced one of the quirks of > the Debian BTS. According to the BTS, it is: > > """ > Fixed in version src:gwyddion/2.28-2 > """ > > In the bottom of the bug log you will find: > > """ > No longer marked as found in versions gwyddion/2.28-2 > """ > > meaning that the bug was (or, rather, used to be) marked as "fixed" in > the same version as it was "found". The BTS handles this by *silently > ignoring the fixed version* and thus concluding the bug is still in > 2.28-2. It then hands that off to Britney and the auto-removal script, > which will consider 2.28-2 as buggy as well.
Ahhh, I was missing this somehow. I rebuilded the current package 2.32-2 in testing and unstable without any problem and thus closed the bug (now hopefully for all versions). > > rendering the BTS page. While the first bug (#709190) is mentioned > > the second one (#713284) is missing on the BTS page: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=r-other-mott-happy > > > > Any explanation for this? > > > > Well, they are merged into each other and thus the BTS decided only to > show one of them in the bug page. However, both bugs appear when you > reference then directly via [1] and [2]. Hmm, OK, I have noticed the merge. However, the BTS behaviour seems to be new to me. But thinking about it it is reasonable. Thanks for all your release team work Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131015144308.go23...@an3as.eu
