On Tuesday 15 October 2013 13:19:38 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > It isn't a false positive in that regard that the package *does* in fact > > contain the virus sample. However, it *is* a false positive, as the > > sample is there intentionally, and no virus scanner can guess the reason > > why it is there. It does no harm in the location where it is, it will > > not spread, so is it in fact a virus? No, it isn't. > > I'm missing why the package cannot use the EICAR test virus signature for > its purposes.
In libmail-deliverystatus-bounceparser-perl case, the virus is used on the non-regressions test which are shipped in the original tarball (and in Debian *source* package). This virus is *not* shipped in Debian binary package. HTH -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2288634.F14KR057Sc@ylum
