On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I have just found out that there's already a source package called > "trove" in Debian: > > http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/trove > > Lucky, I don't think it will clash with OpenStack trove since it > produces libtrove-java* .deb files, though that's quite annoying. The > source package for OpenStack Trove will have to be called something like > openstack-trove, which isn't nice. > > Also, in PyPi, there is: > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/TroveClient > > which would clash with python-troveclient. This pypi module was uploaded > more than a year ago. Since I have already uploaded python-troveclient > (currently waiting in the FTP master's NEW queue), OpenStack troveclient > will be in Sid, but if some day, someone wants to upload TroveClient > from http://dev.yourtrove.com, then we have a problem. > > So, I am really questioning the choice of "Trove" as a name for the > DBaaS in OpenStack. I think it is a pretty bad move. :( > > Is it too late to fix this?
Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more experienced openstack peoples help decide on this...
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
