On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > YunQiang Su, le Tue 17 Sep 2013 19:06:54 +0800, a écrit : >> I am shutdowning the wrong bugs. > > You mean only the wrong bugs, not completely all of them? If your > program had troubles submitting the right ones, I'm afraid it will have > troubles closing the wrong ones. Just close all of them and submit your > program here with rationale before starting it. There is about 200 true bugs report, while another about 300 is invaild
> > Also, I'm really unconvinced -L/usr/lib does really bring any problem > anyway, see what I wrote: Yes, we can talk about it here. Say sorry again. > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: >> > which will make it ftbfs if there is libraries under /usr/lib, >> > while is not the default architecture, mips* for example. >> > >> > On mips* systems, /usr/lib is defined as place to hold O32 >> > libraries, and /usr/lib32 for N32, and /usr/lib64 is for N64. >> >> That's not necessarily a problem: a spurious -L/usr/lib does not hurt, >> the linker will simply not take the binaries. It's only if -L/usr/lib >> is required for proper linking that it would be a problem. But the >> compiler already has that in its search path, so there is really no >> problem. >> >> > Beside the way, on the multiarch system like Debian, user may install >> > libraries under /usr/lib by hand. >> >> No, they are not supposed to be doing that. > > Samuel -- YunQiang Su -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKcpw6X6-8WazWV1XxG_zogwX71Fv4KZCRfXYNoA5b=rzbv...@mail.gmail.com
