On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:35:34AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> writes:
> > +++ Ian Jackson [2013-08-20 16:05 +0100]: > > > >> The bigger problem for a Debian LTS is this: 1. who is going to do > >> security support for it ? > > Ideally it would be the people that want releases supported longer - > > e.g this dreamhost outfit, and presumably many organisations like them. > > Security support is a very parallelisable task, so a small amout of > > work by a lot of interested people ought to be do-able, but for > > whatever reason this never seems to have prospered as a model. It > > would be interesting to know why those entities that would like the > > LTS don't choose to do this. Is it just because we don't make it easy > > for them or because of free-loader aspects? > > I have always thought that there was room for a business selling > > longer-term Debian support. Maybe someone does? > Quite. > Perhaps we just need to have a long-term-support page with pointers to > those willing to provide that service to others, as well as resources > for those who would rather co-operate on providing it for themselves. If that's all we provide, I think it's inevitable that businesses will continue to seek more turnkey solutions for long-term OS support. I believe that if Debian really wants to address the support gap, it's going to require some kind of officially-blessed security support service, and not just a web page telling users that they have "options". > It seems to me that doing things to keep these people cheerful should > attract a financial reward. If that made the somewhat more enlightened > companies band together to share the LTS workload amongst themselves > somehow (possibly by having a limited distribution model of some sort, > restricted to members of the mutual-support-club) then that would be no > bad thing either. I agree that this is not something that's going to happen on a volunteer basis and realistically it needs to be funded somehow. I don't know what the right model for funding that would be, though I think it would be better for Debian as a whole if the end product could be made public. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
