"Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes: > On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 20:42 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: >> Does anybody know what is going on with grub in testing? I have been >> waiting for 2.00, but it seems to be stuck at 1.99. Grub-common at >> http://packages.debian.org/jessie/grub-common shows that it is at >> 1.99-27+deb7u1, but the source files show 2.00-14. The qa page at >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/grub2.html shows that 2.00-14 was >> migrated to testing on 2013-06-14, so there appear to be some >> inconsistancies. > > The migration notification is in error; it's a bug in the script that > generates the notifications, that doesn't ignore extra entries included > in the Sources files added by the archive management software in order > to help with some license compliance. Now that we're aware of it, that > bug will be fixed. > > As you mention checking the Sources files, I suspect you've made the > same (reasonable) mistake that the script is currently making - if the > stanza has "Extra-Source-Only: yes" then it is only there for compliance > and does not indicate that the package is in testing. > > Apologies for the confusion; grub2 2.00 has indeed not yet made it to > testing.
Thank you for the explanation. I don't really want to use unstable so I'll just continue waiting. -- Carl Johnson ca...@peak.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87li4x46jo.fsf@oak.localnet
