Thomas Goirand <zigo <at> debian.org> writes: > > You have to define what problem we are trying to solve. And this still > hasn't been defined yet in this list.
What for? Seriously. There are a whole lot of features in systemd which I, for one, do NOT want to do without any longer. Decent process state reporting. Decent and comprehensive logging. Service termination that works reliably. The ability to run processes in their own namespace without jumping through hoops and spending a day debugging the stuff. Socket activation. Udev activation. Replacing a whole heap of somewhat-buggy sysvinit scripts. I could go on. systemd's feature list is impressive, and so is the list of distros which have adopted it. Ship basic sysvinit scripts for the handful of non-Linux-kernel Debian users if you have to, but otherwise transition to systemd, dammit. Any other option makes no sense whatsoever. IMHO. Among the heap of computers I own, every single one runs with systemd (even the outdated v44 in Wheezy is better than sysvinit), and I'd rather switch distros than going back. Seriously. -- -- Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/loom.20130718t212613-...@post.gmane.org
