On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:36:40PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 07/17/2013 09:26 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:58:49AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >>I am sorry, but in my eyes, people who claim that PulseAudio is useless > >>simply don't realize that there can be sound setups which are a little > >>more sophisticated than just a single sound card and configuring > >>these can be PITA when you don't have PA. > >I certainly wouldn't claim that PulseAudio is useless - I quite appreciate > >its features for desktop control of managing multiple sound inputs/outputs, > >precisely for the reasons mentioned in this thread - but "once bitten, twice > >shy". > I don't want to point fingers here I somehow doubt that. > but there is a distribution with a parent company in South Africa I don't know of any distribution with a parent company in South Africa. ;) > which is infamous for adopting upstream new upstream projects before they > have matured. Be it PulseAudio or KDE 4.0. That's Fedora, right, which adopted PulseAudio in 2007 and told the rest of the world it was ready for production use? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePulseaudio -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
