On Sat, 2013-07-13 at 15:32:15 +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 02:33:57PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Hmm, do you have a reference? I've looked in the gnupg git master and > > stable-2.0 branches and I don't see any obvious mention of this on the > > NEWS file, or commit messages after a quick search. I'd fine it very > > strange that such option would disappear, and it would mean that for > > example dpkg-dev could not use gnupg 2.x at all then. > > Upstream has indicated an intention to remove multiple keyring support > in GnuPG 2.1. I can't find the reference to the explicit statement > where Werner said he was going to do that, but you can see opposition on > gnupg-users in the following threads: > > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-August/042699.html > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-August/042725.html > > As you can see from the threads above, I agree that it is a bad idea.
Ah, from Werner's reply in <http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2011-August/042735.html> it would seem like gpgv would not lose such ability, only gpg, which does not look that bad, I got the impression from your comment, support for this was/would get removed from the entire gnupg project. Thanks for the pointers. Regards, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130714224118.ga29...@gaara.hadrons.org
