On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lars Meyser wrote: > No I did not miss that, but I'm not entirely sure of the implications. So if I > use a packaged version of a program which has been modified (e.g. by Debian > patches) I am not obliged to make the source available?
I'm no expert but that would be my interpretation. Also when I asked about the basis of the network part of the AGPL during the GPLv3 talk at DebConf10 in NYC, Bradley said the AGPL was specifically based on modification, _not_ on public performance or other use. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6EBzya+EVws=obbyxH8BU=2nfgro5wiqxx9htrup6c...@mail.gmail.com
