* Stefano Zacchiroli: > I mean, sure, it *is* more tricky to provide such a URL for users that > will be running a *modified* version of INN. But it is exactly the same > kind of difficulties that people distributing modified copylefted > software will have to face to uphold GPL (or equivalent) terms.
We ship package building software which produces source and binary packages. You just copy all of them and are compliant. We currently do not ship a licensing server that helps users with AGPL compliance. My main concern with the license is that compliance is difficult even for those who have no problem whatsoever with sharing their boring local changes. I'm concerned that we're heading to the Linux (kernel) land where Android and others have made GPL compliance a farce. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4fetfx7....@mid.deneb.enyo.de
