On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@wrar.name> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 06:58:34PM +0200, Nick Andrik wrote: > > Since AGPLv3 is really similar to GPLv3 but mostly oriented for > > webapplications, would it make sense to contact Oracle with the > > concerns raised in this thread and ask for clarification and possible > > consideration to change to license to GPLv3 instead? > > > > There could be some possibility that the choice of AGPL over GPL was > > not well considered by their part with all the issues that raises. > > Or, considering the same arguments, to LGPL3+. > They already had a stronger license (SleepyCat is a two-clause BSD with strong copyleft paragraph added), so it doesn't make any sense to relicense to LGPLv3+. O. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org>
