On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:28:59PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > But even if adopted and up to date, it doesn't means that's the
> > correct way of dealing with upstream. Many addresses will be of former
> > developers, and in most situations it will not be the best way to
> > contact upstream. Some will want a mail to a specific mailing list,
> > some other to open an issue in their bugtracker, ...
>
> I disagree with your remark that "...it will not be the best way...":
> DEP5 Upstream-Contact hint is defined as the preferred form of contact
> for upstream.
>
> So if adopted and up-to-date, it will be the correct (and will also be
> up-to-date - that's obviously implied from it being, ahem, up-to-date).
+1
and users should file bug reports if not up-to-date.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130628114123.gc18...@an3as.eu
