> On 14/06/2013 13:49, Wookey wrote: > > +++ Matthias Klose [2013-06-14 13:35 +0200]: > >> Much more often than I do like it, I see bug reports for the toolchain just > >> pointing to a build log. Then looking at the build log, you often just see > >> > >> CC ... > >> CCLD ... (sometimes even colorized) > >> > [...] > > I'll second this. Like Doko, I've spent way too much time recently(ish) > > staring at build-logs. The short-form build logs are often useless for > > working out why something isn't working, or comparing successful > > native builds with failed cross builds, for example. > Same as Wookey. This would save me some time working on the analysis of > rebuilds with clang. >
Late, but still: I am also very much in favour of this, as the lack of full command lines has already caused quite a bit of overhead in my experiments with our goto-cc compiler infrastructure. Best, Michael
pgp8GGKBTjSqy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
