Hi, 3 weeks ago I've uploaded package ticcutils 0.4-3 to unstable. It got accepted for unstable. However, I believe I've made a mistake and didn't request the release team for some measures to be taken. The buildd's are stuck:
"trying to update ticcutils from 0.3-1 to 0.4-3 (candidate is 20 days old) ticcutils is not yet built on i386: 0.3-1 vs 0.4-3 (missing 2 binaries: libticcutils1, libticcutils1-dev) ticcutils is not yet built on amd64: 0.3-1 vs 0.4-3 (missing 2 binaries: libticcutils1, libticcutils1-dev) [...]" (see http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ticcutils) ticcutils 0.3-1 builds binary packages libticcutils1 and libticcutils1-dev ticcutils 0.4-3 builds binary packages libticcutils2 and libticcutils2-dev (Reverse dependencies of those are all maintained/sponsored by me.) I believe I should now: 1) Prepare a better ticcutils 0.4-4 package, which builds libticcutils2 and unversioned libticcutils-dev (which Conflicts: libticcutils1-dev, libticcutils2-dev and Replaces: libticcutils1-dev, libticcutils2-dev). 2) Submit a bug to release.debian.org, requesting "transition tracking" (as per http://release.debian.org/transitions/), apologising for previous mistake and requesting an ACK for uploading ticcutils 0.4-4. 3) Once ACK'd, upload and keep an eye on autobuilders Correct? Please honor mail-followup-to and Cc me on replies. Thanks, Bye, Joost PS / Note to self: ucto 0.5.3-3, timblserver 1.7-3, mbt 3.2.10-3 (this morning) and other stuff in http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html -- Worrying is like paying interest on a debt you may never have owed. --Charlie Papazian about Home Brewing, 1991, quoted by http://mdcc.cx/ Sandor "Wild Fermentation" Elix Katz Joost van Baal-Ilić ※ http://ad1810.com/ ※ Eindhoven, .nl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130615163501.gg...@beskar.mdcc.cx
