On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:49:59 -0400, Chris Knadle
<chris.kna...@coredump.us> wrote:
>On Friday, June 14, 2013 02:31:45, Marc Haber wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:42:15 -0400, Chris Knadle
>> <chris.kna...@coredump.us> wrote:
>> >So right now I think that I probably just didn't know that this had been
>> >fixed, because I haven't been using the "split file" configuration for
>> >along time.  I clearly remember having _upgrade_ problems in 2003 with
>> >Exim on Debian Testing, but I might be confusing the root cause of those
>> >problems at that time; there are occasional required configuration
>> >changes, and that's another possible cause.
>
>I should explain the above a bit further; when using the "split file" 
>configuration and choosing "N" to certain config file updates, that leaves 
>behind several .dpkg-dist config files.

And if you choose "Y", .dpkg-old config files are left. That's basic
dpkg functionality, and it has always been the case that files that
don't match the [-a-z0-9] rule are ignored. .dpkg-foo files have a
period and get ignored. See run-parts(8)

Grüße
Marc
-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1unk3x-0001da...@swivel.zugschlus.de

Reply via email to