Philipp Kern wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:02:58AM +0200, Raphael Geissert wrote: >> Re cdn: >> >> IIRC the main blocker was that it plays with DNS records and would be a >> bit painful to have to support such a configuration in part due to >> DNSSEC. > > And it uses the location of the DNS resolver of the user, which we should > get rid of.
Well, yeah, but that's a design issue rather than something that would affect its inclusion as an official service. > Having the client IP, like http.d.n does, can yield more > informed decisions unless people invest time to implement support for the > client subnet EDNS0 extension and possibly applying for the needed > whitelistings. Indeed. Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/koqq2a$j52$1...@ger.gmane.org
