On May 28, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:27:36 -0700, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> > wrote: >> (The shading of meaning between those two options could be clearer. I >> took it as a measure of enthusiasm and personally answered "I welcome >> systemd in Debian" because, regardless of whether it becomes the default, >> I'm happy to provide systemd unit files for my packages. If Upstart makes it into Debian, good luck running (responsible, reliable) servers: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/669481 http://marc.merlins.org/perso/linux/2012-03.html#Ditched-Ubuntu-and-Switched-Laptop-to-Back-to-Debian-64bit Dependency based init already works well, to replace it with a hive of bugs does not make sense. OpenRC is the only one which claims to be reverse compatible, if this is true then OpenRC should be the focus. -- Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/626d6289-00e6-4fda-95d7-94373c852...@syminet.com
