On 05/23/2013 03:55 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 05/23/2013 06:56 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >>> * As you may know, systemd is developed by a large amount of >>> contributors. >> >> If you are tired of seeing the same arguments, > > Personal insults is something you call arguments? You have a weird > method of discussion ...
Sorry, that is probably badly translated from French. I meant as argumentation, or "discussion point". I'm not sure if you got it now. There was nothing about insults or anything like this. > How on earth does that contradict with the fact that 40%, i.e. > the minority of all contributions are done by the original > author. 40% still means that 60% of the code comes from other > people and those are 145 contributors according to ohloh [1]. It's not this way. Last time I checked, there was another upstream doing about 30% of the work. The rest of is probably small patches contributed here and there. Run The facts are that there's no "big community" working on Systemd. There's 2 main authors, and a crowd sending smaller (tiny?) contributions. > OpenRC has 19 [2], upstart has even only 7 [3] contributors. > > So, yeah, systemd is definitely the project which has the > largest amount of contributors which was exactly my point. I'm still not convinced. Don't trust the lies from Lennart, the git clone tells the truth: 4528 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> 3291 Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org> 676 Greg KH <g...@kroah.com> 541 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> 274 Michal Schmidt <mschm...@redhat.com> 190 Martin Pitt <martinp...@gnome.org> 171 Harald Hoyer <har...@redhat.com> There is no other contributor that has done more than 100 patches. If you count people who contributed even a single patch, there's in total 421 "contributors" (but that is not the point, is it?). (just did a "git pull" before running the stats...) BTW, why did you make me repeat myself? Couldn't you search in the list archive? And in what way is this a technical argumentation to choose a init system? What are you trying to prove here? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/519e76ea.2080...@debian.org
