On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 07:02:17PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt > <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > Or that gd needs to not tie its own transition to libtiff, and should go > > back to using libtiff4 until we're ready to do the tiff transition. > > JFTR I have no problem doing that, I didn't have any particular reason > to update to tiff 4.x. I just did update all B-D.
If you're going to update B-Ds, you might as well update to libtiff-dev rather than libtiff5-dev (no need for a real alternative since it only has a single provider in the archive at any one time). That way it'll all be binNMUable once it's time to transition. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130521125316.ga32...@riva.ucam.org
