On 05/06/2013 08:49 PM, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi, > > now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals > for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and > some were already discussed very recently): > > * multiarch compatible binNMUs > * discarding maintainer uploaded binary packages [!arch:all] > * discarding maintainer uploaded binary packages [incl. arch:all] > * extending binNMUs to allow rebuilding arch:all packages (so it's no > longer a "binary only" but a sourceful no-change rebuild - the classic > binNMU should stay of course) > > > Andreas > > ... looking forward to have PPAs in the future :-) Since it ever existed, I wrote my debian/copyright file using the new format. It's quite well established, and it isn't hard to do the switch. It is just a bit boring work though.
I do think it would be nice to be able to parse all of the archive to know what kind of license we're using. If we all work a bit on our own packages, it should be fine, and at some point, we should move forward. But does anyone think it is too much work? I would understand that point of view. Thoughts anyone? Cheers, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/518f2c03.1060...@debian.org
