Am 06.05.2013 19:33, schrieb Julien Cristau: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 19:17:47 +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > >> But why should it _replace_ MySQL, why not providing it as an >> alternative MySQL'ish server? >> > Because Oracle.
That alone does not count, since it is still OSS. As long as _MySQL_ maintainers are able (and want) to continue MySQL (or some other person) there is no reason to not keep it in Debian. I also can not get used to the thought that we only provide one alternative like some other more or less popular distributions, where you need e.g. a HTTP daemon and then you just can install Apache from their repositories. -- /* Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards, Patrick Matthäi GNU/Linux Debian Developer Blog: http://www.linux-dev.org/ E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org patr...@linux-dev.org */
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
