On 2013-05-06 14:49, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi, > > now might be the right time to start a discussion about release goals > for jessie. Here are some points that come into my mind right now (and > some were already discussed very recently): >
While the ideas themselves are worthwhile, they do not seem to be "release goal" material at first glance[1]. (Or possibly I am misunderstanding the "Affect more than just one set of packages" clause in [1]). > * multiarch compatible binNMUs dpkg (and maybe APT) is probably the only tools needing to be changed. That said, from a RT PoV, "multiarch compatible binNMUs" would be appreciated so we don't break m-a with each and every transition. > * discarding maintainer uploaded binary packages [!arch:all] > * discarding maintainer uploaded binary packages [incl. arch:all] > * extending binNMUs to allow rebuilding arch:all packages (so it's no > longer a "binary only" but a sourceful no-change rebuild - the classic > binNMU should stay of course) > I am guessing this is (mostly) a dak/buildd.d.o side change or so. > > Andreas > > ... looking forward to have PPAs in the future :-) > > ~Niels [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals """ Please note: a release goal should be: SMART (Specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, timely) Affect more than just one set of packages (eg: not just a package transition) Have an 'advocate', who can track and keep status of progress. """ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5187af8e.4070...@thykier.net
