On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote: >> We've always treated "FTBFS if built twice in a row" bugs as important: >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian...@lists.debian.org;tag=qa-doublebuild > > The real question is whether or not there is a consensus within the > project that severity should be serious (via a policy "must"), making > such issues release critical, which would be the only way to truly > "eliminate" the doesn't build twice problem.
And/or on the technical side, make the buildds always build twice. Then, you'll get plenty of release-critical FTBFS bugs (from the people that monitor that output) for your other archs when your package doesn't build twice. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mn0h6gz4vsc_vbfydrw5vseu0ji2o1mqra4vb5pbpf...@mail.gmail.com
